Abstract

As rivalry between China and the United States (US) for global dominance of the digital landscape
intensifies, countries across the globe are responding to the impact, with serious implications for their
foreign policy postures. This article extends the concept of rational choice to an examination of strategies
directed by China and the US to influence African policy positions. By applying this framework to an
examination of the Huawei ban in the US and pressure on its allies to follow suit, the article distinguishes
the overriding emphasis of research on global power competition and foreign policy making on the
interests and values of China and the US from an emerging strategy of agency in Kenya. The rational choice
perspective enables us to understand what informs Kenya’s interests, preferences, choices, and foreign
policy decisions in the US Huawei ban. By focusing on the role of domestic factors shaping Kenya’s foreign
policy choices, we come to see how individuals, local businesses, consumers, interest groups,
bureaucracies, and policymakers in Kenya are self-interested rational actors influencing collective action
and shaping the country’s policy choices rather than passive recipients of great power influences. The
article aims to contribute to a strategy of re-centring domestic actors in Kenya’s foreign policymaking and
exerting their agency in the rivalry between China and the US.

DOWNLOAD PDF